<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flodner &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flodner.com/category/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flodner.com</link>
	<description>The new cult Novel, web philosophy, seo, and different aspects of art and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Link Emperor is expensive shit</title>
		<link>http://flodner.com/link-emperor-is-expensive-shit/</link>
		<comments>http://flodner.com/link-emperor-is-expensive-shit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flodner.com/?p=390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet I&#8217;ve got e-mail proclaiming Link Emperor as the best nowadays link building software. From the first glance I liked everything, the nice web-site design and even the brand. (The last computer game I used to play seriously was Rome Total war and Link Emperor&#8217;s design is appealing to the Roman Empire). What was surprising [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bottomcontainerBox" style="border:1px solid #808080;background-color:#F0F4F9;">
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fflodner.com%2Flink-emperor-is-expensive-shit%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=85&amp;action=like&amp;font=verdana&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=21" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width=85px; height:21px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://flodner.com/link-emperor-is-expensive-shit/"></g:plusone>
			</div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://flodner.com/link-emperor-is-expensive-shit/"  data-text="Link Emperor is expensive shit" data-count="horizontal">Tweet</a>
			</div>			
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;"><script src="http://www.stumbleupon.com/hostedbadge.php?s=1&amp;r=http://flodner.com/link-emperor-is-expensive-shit/"></script></div>			
			</div><div style="clear:both"></div><div style="padding-bottom:4px;"></div><p>I&#8217;ve got e-mail proclaiming Link Emperor as the best nowadays link building software. From the first glance I liked everything, the nice web-site design and even the brand. (The last computer game I used to play seriously was Rome Total war and Link Emperor&#8217;s design is appealing to the Roman Empire).</p>
<p>What was surprising is high prices. Cause these prices (the screenshot is at the end of this post) are much higher than the prices of other Seo software. Ok, but Link Emperor pretended to make all linkbulding so it could substitute all the different cheaper programs. So I decided to apply for 3-day trial.<span id="more-390"></span>Firstly I signed up to their affiliate program but it seemed so user-unfriendly so I didn&#8217;t get where to find simple affiliate link. Then I signed up for a trial, which of course did not include link building. And I found the interface of Link Emperor simple but useless comparing to other software I used (i.e. SeNuke). I wanted to try their so proclaimed in promotional video long-tail keyword research option but found nothing. Moreover their keyword gathering option seemed to be worse than existing ones I&#8217;ve seen. Why should one pay more if there are cheaper services which are more credible (Spufy, Semrush, KeywordSpy).</p>
<p>And their link building options seemed to show no big difference with those link building tactics I&#8217;ve seen before.</p>
<p>So my conclusion is that Link Emperor is designed for lazy web-entrepreneurs who don&#8217;t have time and abilities to discover other software and seo knowledge by themselves. But even for them the way Link Emperor looks could be complicated. If I consider it not very usable so the newbie could be completely lost there.</p>
<p>Here is their pricing screenshot for now (I&#8217;m sure they will lower the prices soon)</p>
<p><img class="alignleft  wp-image-391" title="link-emperor" src="http://flodner.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/link-emperor.bmp" alt="link emperor" width="597" height="403" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flodner.com/link-emperor-is-expensive-shit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Top Firefox Plugins (For seo and not only for seo)</title>
		<link>http://flodner.com/my-top-firefox-plugins/</link>
		<comments>http://flodner.com/my-top-firefox-plugins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flodner.com/?p=293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet I have my windows newly installed. And I decided to download new Mozilla Firefox (5.0.1) version. And I decide to &#8220;start my web-browsing from a new blank list&#8221;. New day is like a blank new page where there is no large amount of URLs written, boormakrs, etc. etc. So I decided to write this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bottomcontainerBox" style="border:1px solid #808080;background-color:#F0F4F9;">
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fflodner.com%2Fmy-top-firefox-plugins%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=85&amp;action=like&amp;font=verdana&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=21" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width=85px; height:21px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://flodner.com/my-top-firefox-plugins/"></g:plusone>
			</div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://flodner.com/my-top-firefox-plugins/"  data-text="My Top Firefox Plugins (For seo and not only for seo)" data-count="horizontal">Tweet</a>
			</div>			
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;"><script src="http://www.stumbleupon.com/hostedbadge.php?s=1&amp;r=http://flodner.com/my-top-firefox-plugins/"></script></div>			
			</div><div style="clear:both"></div><div style="padding-bottom:4px;"></div><p>I have my windows newly installed. And I decided to download new Mozilla Firefox (5.0.1) version. And I decide to &#8220;start my web-browsing from a new blank list&#8221;. New day is like a blank new page where there is no large amount of URLs written, boormakrs, etc. etc. So I decided to write this post about my Favorite Firefox Plugins while I will be installing them once again. <span id="more-293"></span></p>
<p>1) SEO for Firefox</p>
<p>You can download it here. http://tools.seobook.com/firefox/seo-for-firefox.html It is my favorite and most usable plugin. It allows you to get all the site data necessary for a brief site analysis.</p>
<p>2) Rank Checker</p>
<p>The plugin from the same SEObook, which  is a perfect tool for those who are not willing to make their brains burn after complicated keyword analysis. It would be easy operated by the newbies in keyword research. Simple interface and neat results. You can download it here: http://tools.seobook.com/firefox/rank-checker/</p>
<p>3) Shareaholic</p>
<p>If you use social bookmarking services &#8211; you need to have a sb plugin which will save lots of your time. From the existing plugins I prefer Shareaholic (like a alcoholic, hahahaha) It has all necessary sb sites I have profiles on. You can find it here https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/shareaholic-share-links-with-g/</p>
<p>4) FireFTP</p>
<p>Among many FTP clients I prefer the browser-addition which won&#8217;t add +1 extra program and window. FireFTP is easy in use so I will recommend it https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/fireftp/</p>
<p>5) SearchStatus</p>
<p>To the some extent it is similar with SEO for Firefox, but I prefer to use both. Mostly I use this plugin to highlight nofollow links, to check whois and to see the site in archive. You can find it here https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/searchstatus/</p>
<p>So here is my top-5 plugin list. Of course there are many useful plugins, but right now I don&#8217;t plan to install more. I keep in mind some more plugins so I may write about them in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flodner.com/my-top-firefox-plugins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PageRank sucks as a criteria</title>
		<link>http://flodner.com/pagerank-sucks-as-a-criteria/</link>
		<comments>http://flodner.com/pagerank-sucks-as-a-criteria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 13:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flodner.com/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet How many people are waiting for the pagerank update? If we assume I think it would be a big number. Last year pagerank update was on New Year, then it was in April. I had an idea that PR update would be also on New Year this year. They could make this criteria biannual, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bottomcontainerBox" style="border:1px solid #808080;background-color:#F0F4F9;">
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fflodner.com%2Fpagerank-sucks-as-a-criteria%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=85&amp;action=like&amp;font=verdana&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=21" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width=85px; height:21px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://flodner.com/pagerank-sucks-as-a-criteria/"></g:plusone>
			</div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://flodner.com/pagerank-sucks-as-a-criteria/"  data-text="PageRank sucks as a criteria" data-count="horizontal">Tweet</a>
			</div>			
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;"><script src="http://www.stumbleupon.com/hostedbadge.php?s=1&amp;r=http://flodner.com/pagerank-sucks-as-a-criteria/"></script></div>			
			</div><div style="clear:both"></div><div style="padding-bottom:4px;"></div><p>How many people are waiting for the pagerank update? If we assume I think it would be a big number. Last year pagerank update was on New Year, then it was in April. I had an idea that PR update would be also on New Year this year. They could make this criteria biannual, updated randomly twice a year. But no, there is no update. For several weeks I hear from different people that update is in process. But I haven&#8217;t seen the single site with updated PR&#8230; Do you still want to keep illusions? Or would you agree with me that PageRank is dead as a criteria. Lots of people still use it while analyzing sites and will continue to use it. But for me this is outmoded rank. The guys from Google probably laugh at people&#8217;s obsession with PR. Moreover this obsession could be the main reason why they decided to forget about updating PR&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flodner.com/pagerank-sucks-as-a-criteria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter &#8211; Zwitter</title>
		<link>http://flodner.com/twitter-zwitter/</link>
		<comments>http://flodner.com/twitter-zwitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flodner.com/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet I was wondering how did nobody discover this similarity both in name and pronunciation. &#8216;Zwitter&#8217; is Hermaphrodite in German language. Once I&#8217;ve made this video which has 1,585 views for this particular moment. It was uploaded on June 4th, 2009. So this amount of views is quite small, taking to the account that twitter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bottomcontainerBox" style="border:1px solid #808080;background-color:#F0F4F9;">
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fflodner.com%2Ftwitter-zwitter%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=85&amp;action=like&amp;font=verdana&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=21" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width=85px; height:21px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://flodner.com/twitter-zwitter/"></g:plusone>
			</div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://flodner.com/twitter-zwitter/"  data-text="Twitter &#8211; Zwitter" data-count="horizontal">Tweet</a>
			</div>			
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;"><script src="http://www.stumbleupon.com/hostedbadge.php?s=1&amp;r=http://flodner.com/twitter-zwitter/"></script></div>			
			</div><div style="clear:both"></div><div style="padding-bottom:4px;"></div><p>I was wondering how did nobody discover this similarity both in name and pronunciation. &#8216;Zwitter&#8217; is Hermaphrodite in German language. Once I&#8217;ve made this video which has 1,585 views for this particular moment. It was uploaded on June 4th, 2009. So this amount of views is quite small, taking to the account that twitter remained a trend for all this time. <span id="more-103"></span></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LFu-9Y48XVE&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0&amp;color1=0x234900&amp;color2=0x4e9e00" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LFu-9Y48XVE&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0&amp;color1=0x234900&amp;color2=0x4e9e00" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flodner.com/twitter-zwitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An old seo article</title>
		<link>http://flodner.com/an-old-seo-article/</link>
		<comments>http://flodner.com/an-old-seo-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flodner.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Hello once again. As you can see &#8211; the previous post was my old seo article. It is very-very old. I didn&#8217;t even had it on my laptop, only on the old hard drive which I don&#8217;t use for a long time. I&#8217;ve found it accidentally on my gmail account. I think that almost [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bottomcontainerBox" style="border:1px solid #808080;background-color:#F0F4F9;">
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fflodner.com%2Fan-old-seo-article%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=85&amp;action=like&amp;font=verdana&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=21" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width=85px; height:21px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://flodner.com/an-old-seo-article/"></g:plusone>
			</div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://flodner.com/an-old-seo-article/"  data-text="An old seo article" data-count="horizontal">Tweet</a>
			</div>			
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;"><script src="http://www.stumbleupon.com/hostedbadge.php?s=1&amp;r=http://flodner.com/an-old-seo-article/"></script></div>			
			</div><div style="clear:both"></div><div style="padding-bottom:4px;"></div><p>Hello once again. As you can see &#8211; the previous post was my old seo article. It is very-very old. I didn&#8217;t even had it on my laptop, only on the old hard drive which I don&#8217;t use for a long time. I&#8217;ve found it accidentally on my gmail account. I think that almost every active internet user can find lots of interesting information while browsing your mail. And could you imagine what a crisis (catastrophe) will occur if to say google stops its existance&#8230; What a huge loss of data depends only on one company. Guys, I advise you to diversify and of course I should follow this advice as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flodner.com/an-old-seo-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why WordPress is Good for Seo</title>
		<link>http://flodner.com/why-wordpress-is-good-for-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://flodner.com/why-wordpress-is-good-for-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onsite optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flodner.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Press and Word your SEO WordPress offers two opportunities for the web-community. The easier choice is WordPress.com – you can start own blog in two minutes and have address like your_name.wordpress.com. The other one is WordPress.org where you can download this free software and install in whatever you want. Both for personal blogs and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bottomcontainerBox" style="border:1px solid #808080;background-color:#F0F4F9;">
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fflodner.com%2Fwhy-wordpress-is-good-for-seo%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=85&amp;action=like&amp;font=verdana&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=21" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width=85px; height:21px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://flodner.com/why-wordpress-is-good-for-seo/"></g:plusone>
			</div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://flodner.com/why-wordpress-is-good-for-seo/"  data-text="Why WordPress is Good for Seo" data-count="horizontal">Tweet</a>
			</div>			
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;"><script src="http://www.stumbleupon.com/hostedbadge.php?s=1&amp;r=http://flodner.com/why-wordpress-is-good-for-seo/"></script></div>			
			</div><div style="clear:both"></div><div style="padding-bottom:4px;"></div><p><strong>Press and Word your SEO </strong></p>
<p>WordPress offers two opportunities for the web-community. The easier choice is WordPress.com – you can start own blog in two minutes and have address like your_name.wordpress.com. The other one is WordPress.org where you can download this free software and install in whatever you want. Both for personal blogs and for commercial sites I recommend to buy nice-looking domain (which in ideal must represent those topics or services which you offer) and hosting. In WordPress.com page you&#8217;ll have very limited possibilities, so in this article I won&#8217;t focus on it. This kind of blog I will recommend only for those who have littler or no experience in blogging and web-design. I&#8217;m sure most of you are familiar with WordPress platform, however there are may aspects which may seem invisible or even ordinary but they really help for the search engine optimization of your site.<span id="more-91"></span></p>
<p>If you are not fond of programming or paying lots of money for web-site creation – WordPress would be one of the best choices. It&#8217;s really easy to install it to the server, to choose template and to add plugins depending on the needs of your site. Of course I won&#8217;t memorize all of the moments which present WordPress advantages (some of them are still unknown for me). Moreover I want to provoke the discussion, the result of this discussion will be helpful for all SEO experts. So here you are.</p>
<p><strong>The essence of WordPress is SEO-friendly </strong></p>
<p>Being tired of on-page optimization? Being frustrated of all the advises you hear? Are you disappointed and not sure how your pages must be optimized to display high in the SERPs? WordPress can remove this headache. Web-site structure of WordPress platform is already optimized and many plugins are written to help you even more (in example the plugin for automatic generation of web-site map). Pages get quickly indexed by Google and other search enignes&#8217; spiders. Title, meta-tags and keywords are easy to input (all-in-one-seo plugin) and they are displayed properly. WordPress contains RSS feed and RSS for comments, with the help of plugin your site would be bookmarked in Technorati or one of the famous social bookmarking sites by one click. There is also plugin which constructs the page according to your title. For example you are offering translation. Then instead of number or odd words, your page will look like your_site.com/english-to-spanish-translations.php which also will help you in SERPs.</p>
<p><strong>Statistics – the portrait of your visitors </strong></p>
<p>Who are visiting your sites Where do visitors come from? Which sites are referring to your? These and similar questions you will always have in your mind. Statistics provides the answer for such questions. You can either choose to place GoogleAnalytics (there is appropriate plugin) or connect you site to Statcounter. Also WordPress has own blogs, like StatPress – you can pick up as many as you want depending from you needs. Some statistic plugins show not only user-visitors, but spiders and by analyzing spider-activity you can see which search engines index you site and how regular they do it. Most popular pages, keywords by which your site is clicked – you need to need to know this and similar information to increase your audience, target more and more users and have good SERPs.</p>
<p><strong>When the links are just rolling in </strong></p>
<p>In WordPress platform which is designed for blogs and blog-like looking sites there is a special feature Blogroll. In few seconds you can add any link you want, i.e. link of the blog you like, link of the sponsor or partner. That&#8217;s why it would be easier for you to obtain inbound links to your site. Bookmarking which I&#8217;ve already mentioned also will seriously increase the number of your backlinks. Of course it the content will be valuable. WordPress cannot provide unique and interesting content for you, but it helps you to present it structured and neat both for visitors and for search engine spiders.</p>
<p><strong>AdSense usability </strong></p>
<p>A lot bloggers have Adsense or other type of advertising on their sites. Even commercial sites for which AdSense will never be main part of revenue have these adds. Why won&#8217;t you monetize the value of you site? WordPress has many plugins designed for AdSense, which will help you manage your adds efficiently and effectively. In example, you can choose either to place you adds above or below your post, choose which post you don&#8217;t want to show adds, etc. All these modifications will take just few clicks and you will save your time and earn more money. If you are newbie to AdSense and don&#8217;t know where to place it to achieve more clicks, the plugins are designed by professionals who know. So you don&#8217;t have to worry.</p>
<p>These moment I&#8217;ve chosen to start our discussion. As you see I like WordPress but I never make idols. With the same pleasure I will discover if other platform will overwhelm the achievements of WordPress. I think it would be really helpful to look at every web-site software, CMS, platform with SEO-concern. Such view is not for everyone, but it is necessary for SEO-experts. If you are already an expert or you plan to become one – let&#8217;s test, discuss and try.</p>
<p><strong> Then we&#8217;ll obtain: </strong></p>
<p><strong>S</strong>uccess<br />
<strong>E</strong>fficiency<br />
<strong>O</strong>rder                                                                                         in all our projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flodner.com/why-wordpress-is-good-for-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Google domination</title>
		<link>http://flodner.com/the-google-domination/</link>
		<comments>http://flodner.com/the-google-domination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flodner.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet What do you think when the Google domination would stop? I don&#8217;t mean it should be considered as some goal. No, not at all. But the internet is changing rapidly and dramaticly. New ideas, new projects and new companies could change Google&#8217;s monopoly. But when? Now Google&#8217;s profits grow and so do their products [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bottomcontainerBox" style="border:1px solid #808080;background-color:#F0F4F9;">
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fflodner.com%2Fthe-google-domination%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=85&amp;action=like&amp;font=verdana&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=21" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width=85px; height:21px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://flodner.com/the-google-domination/"></g:plusone>
			</div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://flodner.com/the-google-domination/"  data-text="The Google domination" data-count="horizontal">Tweet</a>
			</div>			
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;"><script src="http://www.stumbleupon.com/hostedbadge.php?s=1&amp;r=http://flodner.com/the-google-domination/"></script></div>			
			</div><div style="clear:both"></div><div style="padding-bottom:4px;"></div><p>What do you think when the Google domination would stop? I don&#8217;t mean it should be considered as some goal. No, not at all. But the internet is changing rapidly and dramaticly. New ideas, new projects and new companies could change Google&#8217;s monopoly. But when? Now Google&#8217;s profits grow and so do their products and services. I.e. I really like Google Buzz, I must acknowledge I like it even more than twitter. Yes, I have more than 6 000 followers in Twitter, but almost nobody from this long list ever visits my blog! And in Google Buzz &#8211; when I share some link I assume that 10-15 people click (and I have no more than 30 followers) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flodner.com/the-google-domination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PR 2</title>
		<link>http://flodner.com/pr-2/</link>
		<comments>http://flodner.com/pr-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flodner.com/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet This blog has got PR 2 and I need to say that I&#8217;ve completely forgot about maintainin this blog and writing.. so I didn&#8217;t build links at all. Just one friend put several links and that&#8217;s all. Last time I got no visitors at all! But the good news are that I&#8217;ve got PR [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bottomcontainerBox" style="border:1px solid #808080;background-color:#F0F4F9;">
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fflodner.com%2Fpr-2%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=85&amp;action=like&amp;font=verdana&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=21" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width=85px; height:21px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://flodner.com/pr-2/"></g:plusone>
			</div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://flodner.com/pr-2/"  data-text="PR 2" data-count="horizontal">Tweet</a>
			</div>			
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;"><script src="http://www.stumbleupon.com/hostedbadge.php?s=1&amp;r=http://flodner.com/pr-2/"></script></div>			
			</div><div style="clear:both"></div><div style="padding-bottom:4px;"></div><p>This blog has got PR 2 and I need to say that I&#8217;ve completely forgot about maintainin this blog and writing.. so I didn&#8217;t build links at all. Just one friend put several links and that&#8217;s all. Last time I got no visitors at all!</p>
<p>But the good news are that I&#8217;ve got PR 2 with no efforts at all <img src='http://flodner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flodner.com/pr-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The funniest spam comment ever</title>
		<link>http://flodner.com/the-funniest-spam-comment-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://flodner.com/the-funniest-spam-comment-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flodner.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet At one of my web-sites (not this one) I&#8217;ve received spam comment. Actually I&#8217;ve received millions of spam comments, messages, links, etc. during my web-life. But this one captured my attention! Here it is: i am just a spam comment, of course you can delate me but please, kill me fast ! I know [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bottomcontainerBox" style="border:1px solid #808080;background-color:#F0F4F9;">
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fflodner.com%2Fthe-funniest-spam-comment-ever%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=85&amp;action=like&amp;font=verdana&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=21" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width=85px; height:21px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://flodner.com/the-funniest-spam-comment-ever/"></g:plusone>
			</div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://flodner.com/the-funniest-spam-comment-ever/"  data-text="The funniest spam comment ever" data-count="horizontal">Tweet</a>
			</div>			
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;"><script src="http://www.stumbleupon.com/hostedbadge.php?s=1&amp;r=http://flodner.com/the-funniest-spam-comment-ever/"></script></div>			
			</div><div style="clear:both"></div><div style="padding-bottom:4px;"></div><p>At one of my web-sites (not this one) I&#8217;ve received spam comment. Actually I&#8217;ve received millions of spam comments, messages, links, etc. during my web-life.<br />
But this one captured my attention! Here it is:</p>
<p><em>i am just a spam comment, of course you can delate me but please, kill me fast ! I know that people dont like me, but i dont care, because i am no emo or fuckin pokemon. so please MTV, let my words stay at live !</em></p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve killed him fast as he (or she or it) requested. But I really appreciate the sense of humor of that seo copywriter (or anyone) who wrote it for a spam bot. It made me smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flodner.com/the-funniest-spam-comment-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Links inequality</title>
		<link>http://flodner.com/links-nequality/</link>
		<comments>http://flodner.com/links-nequality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flodner.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet I must acknowledge that the last time I&#8217;ve stopped to follow the seo tendencies, new sites, ideas, projects, et cetera and et cetera. I&#8217;m still sure that links, good quality links &#8211; is the main thing in seo. Links are not equal, they differ by many criterias and I think I have good seo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bottomcontainerBox" style="border:1px solid #808080;background-color:#F0F4F9;">
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fflodner.com%2Flinks-nequality%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=85&amp;action=like&amp;font=verdana&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=21" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width=85px; height:21px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://flodner.com/links-nequality/"></g:plusone>
			</div>
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://flodner.com/links-nequality/"  data-text="Links inequality" data-count="horizontal">Tweet</a>
			</div>			
			<div style="float:left; width:85px;padding-right:10px; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;height:30px;"><script src="http://www.stumbleupon.com/hostedbadge.php?s=1&amp;r=http://flodner.com/links-nequality/"></script></div>			
			</div><div style="clear:both"></div><div style="padding-bottom:4px;"></div><p>I must acknowledge that the last time I&#8217;ve stopped to follow the seo tendencies, new sites, ideas, projects, et cetera and et cetera.<br />
I&#8217;m still sure that links, good quality links &#8211; is the main thing in seo. Links are not equal, they differ by many criterias and I think I have good seo intuition to distinguish wheather the link is good, not so good and shit link.<br />
There is no equality in the world, there is not equality in the web as well! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flodner.com/links-nequality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

